<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glorious Accident?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/</link>
	<description>Official Natural Dog Training Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: christine randolph</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>christine randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>Ah !

is it possible to get my dog to keep her tail a bit down and let the energy flow during the skijoring? 

her tail is almost always all the way up when we do this.

so she is holding back, says the senior musher, and it looks as though you agree.

i would like to participate in a race with her and Freddie next week so it would be nice to get her to really run without holding back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah !</p>
<p>is it possible to get my dog to keep her tail a bit down and let the energy flow during the skijoring? </p>
<p>her tail is almost always all the way up when we do this.</p>
<p>so she is holding back, says the senior musher, and it looks as though you agree.</p>
<p>i would like to participate in a race with her and Freddie next week so it would be nice to get her to really run without holding back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbehan</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>kbehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>This is an important observation. The emotional cog is configured around the p-cog so you could say it is the p-cog plus physical memory. Physical memory in body/mind as emotional battery is triggered by intensity, and it is smoothly released by a concordant frequency. So when a handler is moving fast, the intensity of all this motion triggers the p-cog, and then the frequency, i.e. the wave function of their body language is high smooth rhythmic motion, allows for the p-cog to be PROJECTED (hence it is an emotional cog) and so it&#039;s much easier for the dog to sync up with handler when going fast. (When a dog tucks its tail it&#039;s trying to hold back from projection, and when a dog&#039;s tail is over 90 degrees over topline, it&#039;s trying to keep p-cog from moving after having begun to project it. It&#039;s trying to hold on to a safe frame of reference, afraid to let its &quot;self&quot; go.) 
This is exactly akin to why it&#039;s easier to balance a bike that&#039;s going fast. The physical cog of rider leaves their body and goes lower into the bike because the spinning wheels increase the bike&#039;s mass. So when there&#039;s flow in the system between dog and handler, much easier for dog to be close and in alignment with handler because it is now able to feel the midpoint between them as a means of connection. By projecting its e-cog into handler, it then it works its way to being a midpoint between them, (that is then felt in the heart) the concern about balance now subsumed into the arousal for the movement of energy. In this state heartbeats mean quickening of feeling of suspension/weightlessness rather than sensation associated with fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an important observation. The emotional cog is configured around the p-cog so you could say it is the p-cog plus physical memory. Physical memory in body/mind as emotional battery is triggered by intensity, and it is smoothly released by a concordant frequency. So when a handler is moving fast, the intensity of all this motion triggers the p-cog, and then the frequency, i.e. the wave function of their body language is high smooth rhythmic motion, allows for the p-cog to be PROJECTED (hence it is an emotional cog) and so it&#8217;s much easier for the dog to sync up with handler when going fast. (When a dog tucks its tail it&#8217;s trying to hold back from projection, and when a dog&#8217;s tail is over 90 degrees over topline, it&#8217;s trying to keep p-cog from moving after having begun to project it. It&#8217;s trying to hold on to a safe frame of reference, afraid to let its &#8220;self&#8221; go.)<br />
This is exactly akin to why it&#8217;s easier to balance a bike that&#8217;s going fast. The physical cog of rider leaves their body and goes lower into the bike because the spinning wheels increase the bike&#8217;s mass. So when there&#8217;s flow in the system between dog and handler, much easier for dog to be close and in alignment with handler because it is now able to feel the midpoint between them as a means of connection. By projecting its e-cog into handler, it then it works its way to being a midpoint between them, (that is then felt in the heart) the concern about balance now subsumed into the arousal for the movement of energy. In this state heartbeats mean quickening of feeling of suspension/weightlessness rather than sensation associated with fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine randolph</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>christine randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>i would like to poll you all about having sled dogs on a chain with a house, straw inside etc. in a big sled dog kennel environment. 

have any of you seen any studies etc, have any theories, is that a humane way to keep a dog ? 

since i am working with sled dogs, and helping at a kennel, i would like to know more. the dogs i work with seem very happy...maybe this is the exception,,,

i just read some comments on the below web site, they do not seem to be very scientific...

www.helpsleddogs.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to poll you all about having sled dogs on a chain with a house, straw inside etc. in a big sled dog kennel environment. </p>
<p>have any of you seen any studies etc, have any theories, is that a humane way to keep a dog ? </p>
<p>since i am working with sled dogs, and helping at a kennel, i would like to know more. the dogs i work with seem very happy&#8230;maybe this is the exception,,,</p>
<p>i just read some comments on the below web site, they do not seem to be very scientific&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.helpsleddogs.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.helpsleddogs.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine randolph</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>christine randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>i think if we move with more speed, heeling.moving with us as one center of gravity unit. is easier for our dogs....how would that fit into the energy theory ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think if we move with more speed, heeling.moving with us as one center of gravity unit. is easier for our dogs&#8230;.how would that fit into the energy theory ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Amen!  And Good Job all around to good questions leading to good answers.  I especially enjoyed yesterdays conversion between Heather and Kevin in &quot;Errors and Physical Memory&quot;.  These types of &quot;back-and-forth&quot; sessions are very helpful in sorting things out so that ideas/concepts can coalesce into, hopefully, real understanding.  Thank you all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!  And Good Job all around to good questions leading to good answers.  I especially enjoyed yesterdays conversion between Heather and Kevin in &#8220;Errors and Physical Memory&#8221;.  These types of &#8220;back-and-forth&#8221; sessions are very helpful in sorting things out so that ideas/concepts can coalesce into, hopefully, real understanding.  Thank you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbehan</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>kbehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly right Lee. The emotional center-of-gravity is the key to animal consciousness, it&#039;s completely immaterial and yet it&#039;s the aspect of reality that is what is most real to an animal. So we&#039;re not focusing on how to teach a dog this or that in order to get high points and win an obedience title, but rather why a dog does this or that so that we can live with them in harmony. Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly right Lee. The emotional center-of-gravity is the key to animal consciousness, it&#8217;s completely immaterial and yet it&#8217;s the aspect of reality that is what is most real to an animal. So we&#8217;re not focusing on how to teach a dog this or that in order to get high points and win an obedience title, but rather why a dog does this or that so that we can live with them in harmony. Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Charles Kelley</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Charles Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>Kevin&#039;s statement about how horses shift their center of gravity to include the rider, sparked the following thoughts on teaching a dog to heel by finding a shared emotional center of gravity. (The original is posted on the NDT forum site: http://ow.ly/RrCO)

I read something interesting on Kevin&#039;s blog yesterday (or the day before), about how nearly everyone who takes their first ride on a camel or elephant experiences motion sickness, but this doesn&#039;t happen when riding a horse for the first time. Kevin&#039;s reasoning is that this is because horses know how to adjust their movements to incorporate the rider&#039;s center of gravity.

In thinking about that statement, and in working on a blog article of my own which will compare Cesar&#039;s method of teaching a dog to heel, another, new example from the positive training field (linked below), and Kevin&#039;s work with Laszlo, I realized that what&#039;s missing from both the dominance and +R approach, and what&#039;s now more clear to me about what Kevin does, is that dogs really do have an emotional center of gravity, as Kevin postulates. And when we teach them to heel using thoughtcentric models they have to figure out, on their own, how to match their forward momentum and energy with ours. But when we teach them using Natural Dog Training techniques, no matter how bad we are at it initially, if our goal is to teach the dog to be in-synch with us physically and emotionally (instead of by teaching them to respect our leadership, or by rewarding external behaviors only), at some point we&#039;ll find that we&#039;re creating a feeling in the dog of a shared center of gravity. In that respect, heeling not only feels natural to the dog. It feels really, &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; good.

This also reminded me of how I taught Freddie to heel years ago using techniques from Kevin&#039;s book, where I put him in a high-energy state and found, somewhat clumsily, the invisible point in space where our emotional centers of gravity were aligned and locked together.

&quot;Fine. So what?&quot; Some might argue. &quot;A heel is a heel. The dog learns it or he doesn&#039;t.&quot;

Well, a year or so after I taught Freddie to heel in this way, I was at an ad hoc dog run in my neighborhood (an asphalt basketball court behind a high school on Second Avenue) with Freddie and a Jack Russell terrier named Mack. At one point, it started to drizzle, and some kids in another part of the park started setting off firecrackers. Mack decided he&#039;d like to go home, so he found a gap in the chain link fence, wriggled through, and started trotting up 68th Street toward Second Avenue. I&#039;d been working on Mack&#039;s recall but hadn&#039;t perfected it yet. So I had no choice but to either let him wander into traffic and get run over or to go after him.

I couldn&#039;t wriggle through the fence the way he did, though. In order to get out of there, I had to go the opposite direction. I ran toward the gate and called Freddie in an excited tone, but didn&#039;t waste any time putting his leash on. I just ran and he ran with me.

We crossed 68th Street together and ran toward Second. I was scanning the sidewalk, looking for any traces of Mack, though I couldn&#039;t see him; he&#039;d already turned the corner at the end of the block. Then I finally looked down and saw that Freddie was running right next to me, in perfect synch with my gait, and had been gazing directly up at me the whole time. I hadn&#039;t commanded him to heel. The only thing I&#039;d done was to call his name and run. And he ran with me in a perfect heel. (We turned the corner, I questioned some pedestrians about Mack&#039;s whereabouts, and finally found him wandering the aisles of a video store, pestering the employees for treats!)

The point is, we may get a pretty good heel by training a dog through either dominance or positive reinforcement. But unless we understand how the dog experiences such training techniques as actually interfering with his ability to be in-synch with us both physically and emotionally, we automatically lose the ability to have the kind of pin-point control I had with Freddie in a high-energy, high-pressure situation.

Here&#039;s a link to video, chosen at random off YouTube, showing one example of teaching the heel using &quot;positive reinforcement.&quot; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQYlAkA8gDg&amp;feature=fvw

LCK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin&#8217;s statement about how horses shift their center of gravity to include the rider, sparked the following thoughts on teaching a dog to heel by finding a shared emotional center of gravity. (The original is posted on the NDT forum site: <a href="http://ow.ly/RrCO)" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/RrCO)</a></p>
<p>I read something interesting on Kevin&#8217;s blog yesterday (or the day before), about how nearly everyone who takes their first ride on a camel or elephant experiences motion sickness, but this doesn&#8217;t happen when riding a horse for the first time. Kevin&#8217;s reasoning is that this is because horses know how to adjust their movements to incorporate the rider&#8217;s center of gravity.</p>
<p>In thinking about that statement, and in working on a blog article of my own which will compare Cesar&#8217;s method of teaching a dog to heel, another, new example from the positive training field (linked below), and Kevin&#8217;s work with Laszlo, I realized that what&#8217;s missing from both the dominance and +R approach, and what&#8217;s now more clear to me about what Kevin does, is that dogs really do have an emotional center of gravity, as Kevin postulates. And when we teach them to heel using thoughtcentric models they have to figure out, on their own, how to match their forward momentum and energy with ours. But when we teach them using Natural Dog Training techniques, no matter how bad we are at it initially, if our goal is to teach the dog to be in-synch with us physically and emotionally (instead of by teaching them to respect our leadership, or by rewarding external behaviors only), at some point we&#8217;ll find that we&#8217;re creating a feeling in the dog of a shared center of gravity. In that respect, heeling not only feels natural to the dog. It feels really, <i>really</i> good.</p>
<p>This also reminded me of how I taught Freddie to heel years ago using techniques from Kevin&#8217;s book, where I put him in a high-energy state and found, somewhat clumsily, the invisible point in space where our emotional centers of gravity were aligned and locked together.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fine. So what?&#8221; Some might argue. &#8220;A heel is a heel. The dog learns it or he doesn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, a year or so after I taught Freddie to heel in this way, I was at an ad hoc dog run in my neighborhood (an asphalt basketball court behind a high school on Second Avenue) with Freddie and a Jack Russell terrier named Mack. At one point, it started to drizzle, and some kids in another part of the park started setting off firecrackers. Mack decided he&#8217;d like to go home, so he found a gap in the chain link fence, wriggled through, and started trotting up 68th Street toward Second Avenue. I&#8217;d been working on Mack&#8217;s recall but hadn&#8217;t perfected it yet. So I had no choice but to either let him wander into traffic and get run over or to go after him.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t wriggle through the fence the way he did, though. In order to get out of there, I had to go the opposite direction. I ran toward the gate and called Freddie in an excited tone, but didn&#8217;t waste any time putting his leash on. I just ran and he ran with me.</p>
<p>We crossed 68th Street together and ran toward Second. I was scanning the sidewalk, looking for any traces of Mack, though I couldn&#8217;t see him; he&#8217;d already turned the corner at the end of the block. Then I finally looked down and saw that Freddie was running right next to me, in perfect synch with my gait, and had been gazing directly up at me the whole time. I hadn&#8217;t commanded him to heel. The only thing I&#8217;d done was to call his name and run. And he ran with me in a perfect heel. (We turned the corner, I questioned some pedestrians about Mack&#8217;s whereabouts, and finally found him wandering the aisles of a video store, pestering the employees for treats!)</p>
<p>The point is, we may get a pretty good heel by training a dog through either dominance or positive reinforcement. But unless we understand how the dog experiences such training techniques as actually interfering with his ability to be in-synch with us both physically and emotionally, we automatically lose the ability to have the kind of pin-point control I had with Freddie in a high-energy, high-pressure situation.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to video, chosen at random off YouTube, showing one example of teaching the heel using &#8220;positive reinforcement.&#8221; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQYlAkA8gDg&amp;feature=fvw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQYlAkA8gDg&amp;feature=fvw</a></p>
<p>LCK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine randolph</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>christine randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>hm so what about doing this emotion is a consequence of thought- thing, where we say we have to stay Positive in our thinking, otherwise, the emotions will be tainted and we get all tedious and depressed. 

i.e. if you feel sad and frustrated about not being able to go to California, it is best not to think about it. but think about the stuff you CAN do...

also, if an owner keeps thinking about all the bad stuff a dog has done and might do, the dog will perhaps pick up on that vibe, and do exactly what the owner is projecting. visualizing in his anxiety, anger, whatever negative emotion the owner might have about the stuff the dog is doing wrong for him....but if the owner is completely positive emotionally about the dog&#039;s behaviour, the dog will, potentially, feel that kind of a spin coming off off the owner and have a better success ratio in training, 

...going back to this pendulum experiment, that Mrs. Dunbar did not think was so entertaining.. that i posted on the dogstardaily blog, 
when we try to move the pendulum, we do not FEEL &quot;right&quot;, we (mostly) think &quot;right&quot;, and the pendulum twirls to the right etc...

like those atomic particles in certain physics experiments, where the observer anticipates an outcome and thus influences the experiment - which is why scientists decided they need double blind studies... (am I getting this right &gt;?)

so as a result of this, I am thinking that..energy is also generated by thought, not only emotion ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm so what about doing this emotion is a consequence of thought- thing, where we say we have to stay Positive in our thinking, otherwise, the emotions will be tainted and we get all tedious and depressed. </p>
<p>i.e. if you feel sad and frustrated about not being able to go to California, it is best not to think about it. but think about the stuff you CAN do&#8230;</p>
<p>also, if an owner keeps thinking about all the bad stuff a dog has done and might do, the dog will perhaps pick up on that vibe, and do exactly what the owner is projecting. visualizing in his anxiety, anger, whatever negative emotion the owner might have about the stuff the dog is doing wrong for him&#8230;.but if the owner is completely positive emotionally about the dog&#8217;s behaviour, the dog will, potentially, feel that kind of a spin coming off off the owner and have a better success ratio in training, </p>
<p>&#8230;going back to this pendulum experiment, that Mrs. Dunbar did not think was so entertaining.. that i posted on the dogstardaily blog,<br />
when we try to move the pendulum, we do not FEEL &#8220;right&#8221;, we (mostly) think &#8220;right&#8221;, and the pendulum twirls to the right etc&#8230;</p>
<p>like those atomic particles in certain physics experiments, where the observer anticipates an outcome and thus influences the experiment &#8211; which is why scientists decided they need double blind studies&#8230; (am I getting this right &gt;?)</p>
<p>so as a result of this, I am thinking that..energy is also generated by thought, not only emotion ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbehan</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>kbehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>You bring up a point that speaks to the crux of the matter. While as humane and nice as such a gesture at first seems to be; whether we know it or not we are all busy deep in our subconscious working on a theory of behavior and so I would argue that what you&#039;re suggesting isn&#039;t in fact possible. By this I mean that if we don’t see our dog as a function of energy, then the default setting of dog-as-person fills in the blank. B.F Skinner himself was building a personality theory as evidenced by his expression “little-black-box.” A person is a self-contained autonomous entity of intelligence. So in my view there’s no alternative because there’s no such thing as a detached or impartial observer of nature. We either see what we want to see or what we need to see. The instinctual intellect needs to see a person so that it can generate a pattern to what it&#039;s seeing. 
I would also add that a completely laissez-faire attitude between dog and owner is fine by me, but I believe that would only work if one lived in the middle of nowhere where everything is always the same and one is prepared to never try to change anything about what their dog does. The dog is free to come and go and do as it pleases and whatever will be, will be. If though one ever anticipates having to make any demand on the dog’s behavior and attempt to make any degree of change to what it does, then one needs to know about the distinctions between emotion and instincts, thoughts and feelings in order to understand the principle of emotional conductivity by which complex social behavior evolves in real time. This way the dog is free to be a dog without getting itself killed.    
While it takes energy to generate thoughts, thoughts aren’t energy because you can’t feel them. This is why thoughts by themselves aren’t infectious but the feelings attached to them can be. When a speaker is really excited about a subject, the audience feels this and can likewise become excited. Yet the speaker could convey the same message with the same word but without passion and this leaves the audience unmoved. And because thoughts aren’t energy per se, they also don’t have a thermodynamic quality so that we experience an inevitable consequence in regards to what we think. We are free to think anything without consequence. For example, I could think about wanting to go to California, or I could feel an emotional pull to California and there will be a distinct consequence in the case of the latter but not the former if it turns out that I’m not going to be able to go to California. These distinctions are not inconsequential if we’re going to try to alter a dog’s behavior when it begins to matter to us (the thermodynamic consequences in emotionally investing, i.e. projecting our &quot;self&quot; into another living being) whether the dog lives or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up a point that speaks to the crux of the matter. While as humane and nice as such a gesture at first seems to be; whether we know it or not we are all busy deep in our subconscious working on a theory of behavior and so I would argue that what you&#8217;re suggesting isn&#8217;t in fact possible. By this I mean that if we don’t see our dog as a function of energy, then the default setting of dog-as-person fills in the blank. B.F Skinner himself was building a personality theory as evidenced by his expression “little-black-box.” A person is a self-contained autonomous entity of intelligence. So in my view there’s no alternative because there’s no such thing as a detached or impartial observer of nature. We either see what we want to see or what we need to see. The instinctual intellect needs to see a person so that it can generate a pattern to what it&#8217;s seeing.<br />
I would also add that a completely laissez-faire attitude between dog and owner is fine by me, but I believe that would only work if one lived in the middle of nowhere where everything is always the same and one is prepared to never try to change anything about what their dog does. The dog is free to come and go and do as it pleases and whatever will be, will be. If though one ever anticipates having to make any demand on the dog’s behavior and attempt to make any degree of change to what it does, then one needs to know about the distinctions between emotion and instincts, thoughts and feelings in order to understand the principle of emotional conductivity by which complex social behavior evolves in real time. This way the dog is free to be a dog without getting itself killed.<br />
While it takes energy to generate thoughts, thoughts aren’t energy because you can’t feel them. This is why thoughts by themselves aren’t infectious but the feelings attached to them can be. When a speaker is really excited about a subject, the audience feels this and can likewise become excited. Yet the speaker could convey the same message with the same word but without passion and this leaves the audience unmoved. And because thoughts aren’t energy per se, they also don’t have a thermodynamic quality so that we experience an inevitable consequence in regards to what we think. We are free to think anything without consequence. For example, I could think about wanting to go to California, or I could feel an emotional pull to California and there will be a distinct consequence in the case of the latter but not the former if it turns out that I’m not going to be able to go to California. These distinctions are not inconsequential if we’re going to try to alter a dog’s behavior when it begins to matter to us (the thermodynamic consequences in emotionally investing, i.e. projecting our &#8220;self&#8221; into another living being) whether the dog lives or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine randolph</title>
		<link>http://naturaldogtraining.com/articles/glorious-accident/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>christine randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturaldogtraining.com/?p=839#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>i have been wanting to say, in my &quot;theory&quot; if I had one, thoughts would be energy as much as emotions are- who&#039;s to say that thoughts do not go the same route as emotions, (for instance, as per your theory, gut, heart, big brain etc..)
maybe, the distinction between thought and emotion is completely arbitrary and human-made, and nature does not make this distinction...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been wanting to say, in my &#8220;theory&#8221; if I had one, thoughts would be energy as much as emotions are- who&#8217;s to say that thoughts do not go the same route as emotions, (for instance, as per your theory, gut, heart, big brain etc..)<br />
maybe, the distinction between thought and emotion is completely arbitrary and human-made, and nature does not make this distinction&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
