ADAM asks: I’m still having trouble really feeling and understanding this line…
“The dog perceives being looked at (or called) just as if it is being pushed, just as if its mother is knocking it over and rolling it around on the ground. It’s a force of acceleration, a degree of momentum that demands a terminus.”
Why don’t humans have this kind of reaction? It seems like we never really feel our p-cog disoriented in this way. Is it because we have concepts that guide us? As in we understand what the ground is, what up and down are…I’m trying to relate to how the dog feels…is it like being dizzy from spinning or the feeling of dropping on a roller coaster?
KB: We are affected exactly the same way as a dog, it’s just that our human intellect is so powerful it overwhelms our conscious awareness as thoughts instantly swamp the more subtle emotional awareness. But when someone stares at you, one most definitely becomes aware of their p-cog being displaced, but it happens on a far more subtle scale as well. For example, if you want to get in your car and go somewhere, you first projected your p-cog onto a place, this is end product of displacement; so displacement + projection of p-cog + the perception of a ground = a desire, and it invests your body/mind with a specific degree of acceleration, a momentum that requires a certain expenditure to reach terminus, and until that is achieved the organism will vibrate if not in the process of moving in conformance with a desire.
So one senses an unease about being where they are (displacement) and then they get a sense of a destination (projection) and the feeling for the object of attraction as a suitable ground for the force of acceleration and now this composite constitutes their desire to get into the car and drive to that particular destination. This desire is then compared in an emotional calculus to the degree of resistance perceived between where one is and getting to said ground, and if the force of desire is strong enough, the kids and luggage pile into the car to go to Disneyland. At every step of the way there is that uniform sense of momentum informing you as to how things are proceeding relative to processing resistance toward the desire, and this sense of momentum doesn’t vary from the moment of leaving the driveway to pulling up to the gates of Disneyland. It’s like the internal voice of the GPS navigational system, ever present during every moment of a transcontinental road trip until “Your Destination Is Ahead On The Right!” is triggered at the terminus.
So this emotional calculus is underway in any emotional interaction, but it’s easiest to apprehend by retraining your mind by seeing dogs as creatures of the immediate-moment, and then studying your own mind whenever attached to an energy system, as in driving a car or riding a see/saw.
And then yes, the sensations of rising and falling and spinning, are what a dog is experiencing when he’s watching something moving at high speed once he’s projected his p-cog into it. If he feels fully grounded into the object of attraction then he has a great experience, if he doesn’t feel grounded, then he’s having a bad experience.
So when a dog sees the eyes of another dog, it is displaced and thereby accelerated. The eyes become its definition of terra-firma if it can hold the body of the dog in conjunction with its eyes. If so, it will feel a warm sensual pressure in its deep gut/loin and this may 1) inspire it to urinate, 2) approach along an arc because its rear end goes faster than the front end 3) ingest the essence of the other dog by smelling or tasting its urine, saliva, tear ducts, musk, etc. This pattern of behavior will have a calming effect on the other dog not due to its self-aware intention in performing any of these behaviors but because it is acting prey-like and becoming an emotional ground to the other dog, which then will most likely soften and be inspired to behave in mirror fashion to the dog that’s being prey-like. The other dog will be softened by the first dog acting on it via its hunger circuitry.
ADAM: You also said that the p-cog can move anywhere in the body…is this the physical memory at work? As in the dog feels a certain area of his body stimulated and perhaps “gravitationally pulled” towards “the ground.” And this ground could be anything, as long as it brings stability to the situation? If you could give me a play by play example of how and why a dog would feel his p-cog in his shoulder or foot, or any place I guess that would be helpful.
KB: When a dog projects his p-cog into another, and it moves, it rekindles the physical memory of its own movements when it was imprinted during its infancy and mastering the mechanics of motion as it went toward objects it desired. The stronger the desire, the more it associates the movements of the object with the release of pleasure opiates in the tissues of its body. For the most part, the memory of p-cog traveling through its body travels up the alimentary canal and the point of union is in the mouth, so this is the dog’s number 1 organ of sensual contact. But it can travel anywhere through the body peripheral to alimentary canal and so for example, if a dog rolls on a prey object on the ground and smears its body against it with its shoulder, then its shoulder is being sensualized just as would its mouth, and this becomes a physical memory of pleasure which will inform it how to make contact with a person for example by rubbing its shoulder against someone’s leg. The rump is another likely candidate for a ground as when the dog acquires the physical memory of sitting while looking at something it’s attracted to but can’t make direct contact with. The rear end becomes an indirect means of making contact and so the dog will present its rump for a scratch when sensualized toward a person or another dog. It’s a sensualized, feeling of warmth in that particular region which is the earliest physical memory of the infants co-joined with each other and their mother (before they can control their body temperature), not to mention in the womb before their is any experience of resistance except for what’s chemically impressed into the mother’s bloodstream.