The dog world is literally atwitter over the SPARCS event being held in Phoenix this weekend. Dr. Hecht from “Dog Spies” a co-sponsor of the conference, lists on her website the following questions that will be discussed.
Do dogs engage in ‘mental time travel’? Are they aware of their own past; can they imagine their future?
– Do dogs learn from members of their own species, and even us?
– Could dogs survive without assistance from people?
– Do companion dogs have better welfare than free-living dogs?
– What causes sudden fads for purebred dogs, and do the most popular breeds have the best welfare?
– Are there really personality differences between “dog people” and “cat people?”
– What are the major gaps in our knowledge of dog behavior— gaps which do not exist in a number of other species?
– Is stress bad? Can it ever be useful? Can it be minimized in certain dog populations, like those at the shelter?
One major gap in our understanding of dogs apparently, and surprisingly to me, is why do dogs roll in you-know-what. See Patricia McConnell’s blog for an up to date synthesis for where science stands on this issue.
I say surprising because it seems odd that science is invested in figuring out mental time travel in dogs before understanding why dogs roll in you-know-what. The proverbial trying-to-fly-before-crawl kind of thing. It must be that it’s considered an amusing and trifling oddity. I’m presuming the question was not addressed in the presentations, or if it was, that the answers weren’t any more conclusive than the discussion on Dr. McConnell’s site. So I have to wonder how can something definitive or even intelligently speculative be said about the possibility of mental time travel in the face of such a basic gap in understanding what dogs do everyday. The funding is directed toward high level cognitive function. (But also increasingly, fortunately—and due to the influence of physics I believe–for the rules driven logic of collective behavior. Simon Gadbois made this point to me in an exchange in a Facebook dog group so I’m happy to stand amended.) Nonetheless I can say that the significance to dogs rolling in “disgusting” things speaks directly to the core of how a dog’s mind works. And I suggest that if one wants to plumb the rules that drive the system, one would do well to concentrate on why dogs roll in you-know-what.
Join the exclusive and interactive group that will allow you to ask questions and take part in discussions with the founder of the Natural Dog Training method, Kevin Behan.
Join over 65 Natural Dog trainers and owners, discussing hundreds of dog training topics with photos and videos!
We will cover such topics as natural puppy rearing, and how to properly develop your dog's drive and use it to create an emotional bond and achieve obedience as a result.
Books about Natural Dog Training by Kevin BehanIn Your Dog Is Your Mirror, dog trainer Kevin Behan proposes a radical new model for understanding canine behavior: a dog’s behavior and emotion, indeed its very cognition, are driven by our emotion. The dog doesn’t respond to what the owner thinks, says, or does; it responds to what the owner feels. And in this way, dogs can actually put people back in touch with their own emotions. Behan demonstrates that dogs and humans are connected more profoundly than has ever been imagined — by heart — and that this approach to dog cognition can help us understand many of dogs’ most inscrutable behaviors. This groundbreaking, provocative book opens the door to a whole new understanding between species, and perhaps a whole new understanding of ourselves.
|Natural Dog Training is about how dogs see the world and what this means in regards to training. The first part of this book presents a new theory for the social behavior of canines, featuring the drive to hunt, not the pack instincts, as seminal to canine behavior. The second part reinterprets how dogs actually learn. The third section presents exercises and handling techniques to put this theory into practice with a puppy. The final section sets forth a training program with a special emphasis on coming when called.|
“And I suggest that if one wants to plumb the rules that drive the system, one would do well to concentrate on why dogs roll in you-know-what.”
I couldn’t agree more. But the modern scientific community, a strange mix of self-loathing deconstructionists and self-deifying elitists, must indulge its conceits about animals (and impose them on others).
I suspect that the answer we’d eventually hear is “because they’re dogs”…